April 26, 2006
I've heard this before
That the blogger.com captchas aren't always so random....
For example, I just got this one when commenting at a friend's site:
"GWOWWMD"....
Make of that what you will....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:28 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I have made nothing of that.
Posted by: AW Cunningham 3 at April 26, 2006 03:19 PM (c8tlw)
Posted by: Ken Summers at April 26, 2006 06:25 PM (YElNr)
3
GW OW WMD.... At least, that's what came to mind
Posted by: caltechgirl at April 26, 2006 06:36 PM (jOkK0)
4
I picked up on that possibility but damned if I can make anything sensible of the "OW"
Posted by: Ken Summers at April 27, 2006 04:54 AM (UefPN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Guess I soaked up the culture like a biscuit in butter....
| Dixie Royal |
You are 84% true Southern! You are pure belle or gentleman! You know your Jones Soda, Nehi and RC colas, your Moon Pies and sweet potato pie; you'd absolutely die without air conditioners in the summer, and you've seen Steel Magnolias and Fried Green Tomatoes (or read the book!). Your grandmother lives in an antebellum home and has a cook who makes the best fried chicken and asparagus casserole and summer squash and everything else in the world. And you know the taste of honeysuckle and the feel of grass between your toes.
You are blessed. |
My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender: | You scored higher than 60% on Southerliness |
|
from the Displaced Southerner..
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:25 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I scored 49%, little high, I think, but it could be all the Jimmy Buffett I listen to
Posted by: KG at April 26, 2006 02:05 PM (hyH5v)
2
98% - and I want to know where I lost that 2%!
Posted by: Jenna at April 27, 2006 12:20 PM (f/kUC)
3
I scored a surprising 66%! :-)
Posted by: Princess Jami at April 28, 2006 02:20 PM (0gPLe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 25, 2006
Speaking of Jack Bauer....
Was anyone else happy to see
Dr. Romano with both of his arms back?
BTW, according to the 24 site, his character's name is "Graham" and he is a "power broker"... and may have had something to do with the plane crash that screwed up the previous president....
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:47 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.
And you thought Jack Bauer was special....

Alton Brown doesn't reduce sauces. He demoralizes sauces.
Alton Brown's blender has four speeds: 'stir', 'mix', 'frappe', and 'plasmify'.
Alton Brown can eat just one Lay's potato chip. If he ever bothered to eat food he didn't make himself, that is.
Alton Brown's cakes don't rise. They ascend.
read all of of them!
found here
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:07 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: oddybobo at April 25, 2006 11:03 AM (6Gm0j)
2
This kind of thing would amuse me, if I had any idea who he is.
Posted by: Ken Summers at April 25, 2006 02:09 PM (UefPN)
3
Ha ha ha! I love AB! Met him
once, too.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at April 25, 2006 04:35 PM (0Pi1o)
4
i love watching him, he diagnoses everything i do wrong and using science to show how to fix it
Posted by: jack steel at April 26, 2006 06:04 AM (w26Tt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I missed it yesterday
April 24 is Armenian Martyr's Day.
Read my post from last year.
Millions of people died because of their Christian faith in a well-planned and mercilessly executed attack. Never forget.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
07:13 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
April 24, 2006
FWIW...
This weekend we did a lot of catching up on nothing. Watched a lot of TV, mostly just veging around. Saturday night we watched a very interesting show in HBO. It was a documentary, entitled "Rosie's Family Cruise" and it spotlighted the initial "R Family" cruise for gay families put together by Rosie O'Donnell and her partner Kelli. I was quite surprised at my reaction to it.
Now I know what a lot of you think of Rosie. She'd probably agree with you. And yeah, the documentary was a bit over the top on the self-promotion side since it clearly was made in part as an advertising ploy for future cruise bokings. Yes, I disagree with her politics and her constant insertion of her foot in her mouth, and I'll never understand her crush on Tom Cruise, but clearly her family is important to her. And not just as a political tool.
Surprisingly, we enjoyed it. And you know what? It wasn't preachy. Or political. Well, scratch that. There was one brief scene in which Rosie and Kelli were discussing the defense of marriage act and how it had been voted down. But that was just 2 minutes out of 90.
Read the rest in the extended...
more...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:30 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 934 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Great post. You and I share many of the same opinions concerning gay marriage and gay parentage. I may have to check out the show on HBO, even...
Posted by: Richmond at April 25, 2006 12:55 PM (e8QFP)
2
Nice post. It was long and I read the whole thing.
Posted by: AW Cunningham 3 at April 25, 2006 03:30 PM (c8tlw)
3
I have to disagree with your point on the roles of parenting establishing themselves. There is clearly a distinction between fatherly and motherly love. These are things that can't be "established" since it is inherent in the gender characteristics of the person.
It is not to say that a child raised by two men will turn out bad, but the child will certainly be different. Whether that difference is for the positive or negative, I do not know. I guess time will tell.
Posted by: P-E at April 25, 2006 10:45 PM (VIJfP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
So weird I had to post it...
Paper Dolls Traits and Tendencies: Paper Dolls don't do well when separated; they need regular physical contact to keep in sync. If forced to remain apart for a stretch any longer than eight to ten hours, they can sometimes feel untethered, or even dizzy. But once reunited, all it takes is the simple brush of fingers, or a surreptitious foot-on-foot press under the table, and all is right with the Paper Dolls once again.
Paper Dolls is a Sea Sleepers pose. A possible alternate Sea pose you might enjoy: Sixth Posture of the Perfumed Forest.
Health Note: Ginger pills, available at any health-inspired market, can sometimes calm the jitters that come when unforeseen factors force two Paper Dolls apart.
via the "
Pinching Koala and Tree"
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:05 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Excalibur couples may battle just as much as other couples (and participate in more than their fair share of public huffs), but they look so good together, it outweighs any other deficiencies they may share. It isn't that they're classically good-looking, or similarly sized (though certainly both those pairings are permissible). It's more that the aesthetic chord they strike satisfies in profound ways. Like gorgeously plated food or song filled with unusual harmonies, the wan and freckled hand-in-hand with the tragically tan, the pigeon-toed with the duck-walkers, these Excalibur couples achieve such perfection in their pairing that reminds the world that anything is possible
Posted by: vw bug at April 26, 2006 05:08 PM (G8qpS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
If Michelle Malkin and Allahpundit had a love child...
It would be the first "full-service
conservative Internet broadcast network":
Hot Air!
Drop on by to see what
the buzz is all about.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
09:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
April 21, 2006
Thom Crews: Moron
Like we needed
MORE evidence:
Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes' choice of a Hebrew flavored name for their newborn daughter has speakers of the language scratching their heads.
Baby Suri's name can be traced to a Hebrew word meaning "princess" or "noblewoman," but by such a circuitous route that the connection is lost on most Israelis. Since the birth Tuesday in Los Angeles, bemused Israeli TV and radio presenters have debated the word's origins.
"Nobody here has ever really heard of it," an announcer on Israel's Army Radio said during a discussion Thursday. The Yediot Ahronot newspaper agreed in its half page splash on the celebrity birth.
"We seem to have learned a new Hebrew word and from Tom Cruise, no less," said a Channel 2 TV anchorman.
...
Suri is a pet name for Sarah," Koor told Army Radio. "The Ashkenazi Jews of Poland and Hungary pronounce it Suri."
In ancient Hebrew, Sarah is the feminine form of "Sar," or lord. In modern Hebrew, the word means a Cabinet Minister.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. Idiot.
I believe the name they were looking for is Sarai. That was Abraham's wife's name (in the bible) before it was changed to Sarah. Which means Princess, according to most baby books.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:08 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ThatÂ’s hilarious. I thought it was funny that he just announced an ancient Hebrew name and the whole press just smiled and nodded. Good to know otherwise.
Posted by: Battlerocker at April 21, 2006 03:25 PM (GvaR1)
2
wherefore do celebrities pick such stupid names?
That's funny though. But still better than being named after food (apple, coco)
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at April 21, 2006 05:39 PM (0Pi1o)
3
My favorite part of this.... Suri in Japanese means pickpocket.
Posted by: Bill at April 21, 2006 08:34 PM (I1pLU)
Posted by: Ken Summers at April 22, 2006 12:54 PM (YElNr)
5
Just one more thing for the poor girl to talk about with her therapist some day...
Posted by: Marie at April 23, 2006 05:07 PM (TpiPX)
6
Poor kid, as if she didn't have enough problems already.
Posted by: Janette at April 24, 2006 11:35 AM (OcgcA)
7
Can you Suri? Can you picnic?
Posted by: Sonar at April 26, 2006 08:54 PM (qCS9x)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 20, 2006
Bow before Steve-O!
Cook and Brew-meister extraordinaire
Steve-O displays another talent: Brilliant criticism.
He links
this fabulous Ann Coulter column, then synthesizes it into something beautiful of his own. Especially with regard to the oft heard cry of "hypocrisy!":
"Ann is right about hypocrisy, too. We live in a country where mouth-breathers and slackjaws accuse people of hypocrisy whenever they criticize any action they themselves have taken in the past. It's sad that the average person has a tiny brain, and that such stupidity passes for logic. Ann tears that argument apart pretty well this week.
An accusation of hypocrisy is a tool a sub-par mind uses to excuse bad or stupid behavior. If I jumped off the Empire State Building, does that mean I lose the right to tell other people not to jump? Of course not. It may seem otherwise to you, if you move your lips when you read and you find butterfly ballots confusing, but to an intelligent person, it's obvious that it's ALWAYS okay for ANYONE to advise you to avoid stupid behavior.
...
True hypocrisy involves an element of dishonesty. Falling short of perfection does not make you a hypocrite.
If you want to do something stupid or immoral, don't be a whiny little boy and say, "You're not perfect, either." Be a man and say, "I know I shouldn't do this, but I'm doing it anyway, because I don't care if it's right." Or "because I'm weak." Or "because I'm an addict." Don't hide behind a child's favorite lame argument."
Read the
whole thing! It is a thing of beauty.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
07:52 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 263 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Excellent post. Tell it like it is.
Posted by: Dash at April 22, 2006 07:22 AM (zJsUT)
2
I'm sorry, but I just can't put the words "fabulous" and "Ann Coulter column" in the same senense. The woman is just vile.
Call me a hypocrite, ya know
Posted by: Ben at April 23, 2006 12:42 PM (6O5DM)
3
Did you read the column? Methinks you would have much praise for it if there was a different name on the byline....
Posted by: caltechgirl at April 24, 2006 12:49 PM (/vgMZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Lefty Morons get it WRONG again
Go
here quick before they take it down!
You know the whole flap about Michelle Malkin? Well, these assholes tried to do the same thing with some prominent Righty Bloggers and supposed-Righty Bloggers.
Except the contact info is pretty much all wrong. Poor Jonah Goldberg of Forest Park, GA....
And Rusty Shackelford? Umm, that's a pseudonym you morons.
h/t Rachel, who found it here
Posted by: caltechgirl at
03:33 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
1
apparently the addresses are all autoshops. But yeah, I had to laugh at them putting Rusty's name up there as being real
Posted by: KG at April 20, 2006 09:14 PM (SZsz5)
2
I have to be careful. In the phone book, I really am listed under RightWingDuck.
I should have thought this whole thing through.
Posted by: RightWingDuck at April 21, 2006 07:21 AM (1AWMf)
3
*giggles*
Steve Green lives in Rancho Cuca*munga?
Jeff Goldstein in MONTANA??
And Rusty Shackleford in Waukegan??
The kicker was ACE. . .ALA-freakin'-BAMA!! (I have no idea where he really lives but I always just assumed New Yawk.)
Next thing you know, you'll be telling me there's not an Easter Bunny!
(An idiot has been let loose in the Blacklist. c*a*m* is questionable content?)
Posted by: Margi at April 21, 2006 07:38 AM (BRtaN)
4
Hugh Hewitt has a long commute everyday from his house in MN to his law classes in California. And what's with these morons saying Malkin's actions constitute "fascism, clear and simple"? These people wouldn't know fascism if its boot stomped on their faces.
Posted by: AW Cunningham 3 at April 21, 2006 11:16 AM (c8tlw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Gee. what a surprise...
You Are Midnight |

You are more than a little eccentric, and you're apt to keep very unusual habits.
Whether you're a nightowl, living in a commune, or taking a vow of silence - you like to experiment with your lifestyle.
Expressing your individuality is important to you, and you often lie awake in bed thinking about the world and your place in it.
You enjoy staying home, but that doesn't mean you're a hermit. You also appreciate quality time with family and close friends.
|
h/t fellow night owl
Deb
Posted by: caltechgirl at
12:55 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
A question for the readers
The ladies of
The Cotillion have been having an interesting discussion about the internet and pRonoRgaphy (being hyper vigilant about assholes looking for smut here, sorry).
Several recent articles seem to indicate that because of the free availability of otherwise taboo sex (like child r@pe) on the internet and the anonymous ability to set up a liason, otherwise "normal" (whatever that means) men (and women) are doing things that they would never otherwise dream of.
Has the internet increased sexual perversion or merely made this kind of thing more visible? Has internet availability caused men (and some women, to be honest) to pursue sexual gratification in ways that they would otherwise not? (and I'm not talking about Cybersex with another consenting adult here, or Cybercheating or anything like that)
What about censorship? Does censorship of pornography impact the rest of the net? Do you think that pRon has actually improved the internet (supposedly pRon was behind the development of modern chat rooms, user groups, hi-speed vid capabilities)?
I'm interested to hear your views, especially from the guys. Clearly men and women view pRonoRgaphy and sexual issues differently...
Posted by: caltechgirl at
10:28 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I put up a similar post...I have a feeling not too many will comment due to the personal nature of it..some may be fearful to reply.
Posted by: Raven at April 20, 2006 01:57 PM (1dowF)
2
Ok, not a guy, but...

I'm thinking it's a little of both, honestly. I think that it has made people more willing to do things that they otherwise would've sought help for - because now it's available in the privacy of their own home and "no one needs to ever find out" attitudes prevail. At the same time, I think our culture is on its way to a resurgence of Ancient Rome-like "anything goes" hedonism, and was before all the pron on the Internet was right there for anyone who typos a URL. So - split between symptom and exascerbation.
As for improving the net? I would say no. There are enough ligitimate "needs" for high speed video, teleconferencing, etc. that I think we'd be where we are now even without pron. But I also don't feel that Hefner has done anything for the magazine industry or sexuality or any of the other things he claims to have benefitted.
I don't have any formed opinions on censorship, honestly. In some respects, though I think pron is revolting, I also kind of feel like you have to let people screw themselves up -- because for some of them, if they can't get it there, they're going to get it somewhere else. I'm not a big believer in babysitting the universe.
I'll see if I can get hubs to come and respond, though honestly he might just say ditto.
Posted by: beth at April 20, 2006 02:33 PM (IUoqt)
3
I've thought about this previously -- spurred by the arrested of a certain USC student for trying to do the nasty with a 13 year-old -- and I don't know whether the availability of this stuff on the internet is driving more people to act in more bizarre ways. But even if that's true, the internet is also facilitating ways for law enforcement to catch the creeps who actually commit crimes. Now, instead of old men soliciting young girls in parks, they are probably just as likely to try it on the internet, where there are records of what they have done.
Posted by: AW Cunningham 3 at April 21, 2006 11:22 AM (c8tlw)
4
Pornography is demeaning to the women it features, the women it excludes, and the men it serves. It's expensive, takes forever to download, is packed with viruses, and makes the keyboard sticky.
Worst, I think, is that the stuff I see out there never shows sex in the expression of affection, only in the expression of power, anger, advantage or abuse. The only times you see sex between people who like each other, who treat each other kindly, both people are women.
Guys fantasize as much as other people, but guys are more visually oriented. Every time I'm disgusted by the porn that's out there, I switch to pictures of motorcycles, fast airplanes...other daydreams. At least till tomorrow.
Posted by: Sonar at April 26, 2006 09:26 PM (qCS9x)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 19, 2006
Even if we don't always agree

We're with you Michelle. Those who would seek to intimidate you are the worst kinds of cowards and hypocrites.
h/t imao
Posted by: caltechgirl at
06:52 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ah, but what of her readers who are phoning in death threats against those whose personal contact information she wrongfully posted? Does it work both ways, or do we only support her and ignore the horrific wrongs perpetrated by her readership against a handful of college students who exercised their right to free speech?
Also, she might consider that in the future contact information on press releases is NEVER published except for companies. Individuals provide it so the press can contact them, not so it can be published for the whole world to use and abuse.
Posted by: jason at April 20, 2006 06:28 AM (2uL2e)
2
Actually, Jason, they were not exercising their "right to free speech". Forcing people off campus is not speech. Throwing rocks is not speech.
Please note that she published exactly the info released by the students. She did not publish their home addresses and maps to their homes, unlike what some on the left did to Malkin.
Posted by: Ken Summers at April 20, 2006 06:59 AM (YElNr)
3
Regarding how this all started, Michelle Malkin went to a cached page, took a screenshot, and posted the image on her site because didn't like the politics of the people. It's not her place to justify the disclosing of this information because she deemed that they were terrorizing people. That's an issue for the Santa Cruz police department to deal with, not her own brand of vigilante justice.
As for her own personal details - Malkin included that on her own e-mail list and that's how it went public. She launched her personal information about herself BY herself.
Someone took it a step further and used live.windows.com and yahoo maps to do a
Graphic.
Payback's a bitch eh' Malkin?
Her refusal to remove these kids contact information was not from conviction, but from revenue. Every journalist in the world knows that contact information on a press release is for journalists to call for more information or interviews, not to be published (or even pointed out) in the publication itself. If she were any kind of ethical person she would have pulled the information when asked.
If she were something resembling a human being with "feelings", she would not have republished the information once the students themselves removed it. Michelle is a vicious, vindictive, venomous egoist with no discernible ethics nor even a shred of human decency. If she wants to be The Minority Woman Who Believes Minorities and Women Suck, that's her right. But she should at least have the integrity to acknowledge that she has done wrong and to stop compounding the wrong. And she should not give us that disingenuous crap about how she doesn't condone death threats and nobody should misuse her posting and reposting of personal information.
Posted by: themole at April 20, 2006 04:51 PM (mWnOx)
4
Posters... Cant... Read...
Michelle just re-posted what the jerks had already posted. It was public.
The jerks threatened her and her family, and added a map to her house.
There IS a difference.
Posted by: zoix at April 21, 2006 06:25 PM (Oy3af)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ignore the man behind the curtain
And the HUGE list of categories in the post below. Scroll down for more new stuff. Somehow between the post editor and MuNu, something hiccuped. Not sure what the deal is.
Posted by: caltechgirl at
05:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
It seems like it can't have been that long ago
13 years ago today I was curled in a ball in my Mom's recliner, cuddled under a blanket and drinking hot tea. I was at home sick, and watching CNN. The ATF had held the Branch Davidian Complex under siege for 51 days before raiding their compound, killing 76 people, including the Davidian's leader, David Koresh.
I remember the whole screen erupting in flames as the buildings caught on fire, and wondering why in hell someone would ever think of doing that....or did the ATF do it? Turns out they set themselves on fire. Silly, really.
Two years later, I was home again. Maybe it was Spring Break. I don't recall. But I was watching again as the helicopters swirled around the Murrah building in Oklahoma City and firefighters rushed to save whoever they could. I remember thinking it was the "Arabs" because of the recent attack (first attack) on the World Trade Center. When we found out it was two white guys with an axe to grind we were flabbergasted, but in a way, not really surprised. Especially after the link to the Branch Davidians came out.
Fast forward 4 years and one day. College now, in fact it was my senior year and I was deep in the throes of choosing a grad school and planning a wedding. DH and I were in our bedroom in our apartment (with the only working TV). I was watching the news and he was writing a paper. Breaking News! Shootout in a Colorado HS! At least 12 people dead, including the stupid bastards who did the shooting. In later days, as we learned more about the lives of the two shooters, we were sobered by the fact that this could have been us. Some of you will recall our own "trenchcoat mafia" and the rumors of their weapons and intentions....
My own prayer is that we get through today and tomorrow without yet another somber anniversary.
Many touching remembrances of the OKC bombing across the web today, particularly
this one,
this one, and
this one
Posted by: caltechgirl at
04:55 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
67kb generated in CPU 0.0381, elapsed 0.1424 seconds.
85 queries taking 0.1154 seconds, 261 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.